<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media Shifters &#187; iphone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediashifters.com/tags/iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediashifters.com</link>
	<description>Moving Media Into a Higher Gear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why the iPad Isn&#8217;t Insanely Great</title>
		<link>http://www.mediashifters.com/business/why-the-ipad-isnt-insanely-great/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediashifters.com/business/why-the-ipad-isnt-insanely-great/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insanely great]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediashifters.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has, in the past, always built their consumer products around a need that has either been unaddressed, or closes an obvious “hole” in the marketplace, even if most people didn’t realize how obvious it was until someone built a shiny-white plastic a bridge across it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had a few hours to think about it, I think I’ve finally been able to put my finger on why I’m finding myself underwhelmed by Apple’s whizzy new device they released with a wave of fanfare this morning.</p>
<p>Apple has, in the past, always built their consumer products around a need that has either been unaddressed, or closes an obvious “hole” in the marketplace, even if most people didn’t realize how obvious it was until someone built a shiny-white plastic a bridge across it.</p>
<p>CLOSING A GAP</p>
<p>Before the iPod released there were dozens of different mp3 players appearing on the marketplace. With wonky interfaces and minute amounts of *expensive* flash-ram (16-64mb) these overpriced music players had terrible interfaces, and integrated with your computer in often bizarre ways.</p>
<p>The release of Apple’s music device that all changed in a moment. With a hard drive and a clear, visual interface, it let people play music they way they wanted, but they hadn’t realized it until Steve Jobs held it up for them to see.</p>
<p>The gap in utility before the iPhone was wide and deep. After spending years struggling through a variety of poor interfaces and hacked together half-assed features, the average phone user was ready for a “smart phone” that actually worked. They also wanted something that could act asa a replacement for the growing forest of devices that had been cluttering up the average nerd’s pockets, backpacks, and man-purses. While it took a while for the full feature set to come into place, it was clear from the get-go that Apple had seen the problem, and the Phone satisfied it.</p>
<p>THE KILLER APP</p>
<p>When the iPod launched everyone had been so focused on complaining about piracy, nobody had bothered to offer look at the user’s experience of pirated music and offer a viable digital alternative for legally owning songs in a way that actually came close to giving the customer the kind of utility and flexibility that made having a digital music collection so much fun. That was, until Apple launched iTunes. While it wasn’t the perfect program, it was slick, smooth, useful, and fun.</p>
<p>The App Store, while not quite as gee-whiz as the music store was, realized that if you could develop a way for customers to customize the experience of the device in their pocket they would love you for it. Instead of being a single swiss-army knife for everybody, you could choose the different blades you need, creating a device that fit your style perfectly.</p>
<p>WHAT ABOUT THE iPAD?</p>
<p>You can see in this first slide from the presentation that the iPad is basically about answering a question that nobody had really asked: <em>What would you get if you hacked and iPhone together with a laptop? </em>While the answer is kind of cool, it doesn’t tug at our desires. <em>There is no hole</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-142" title="Step 1: Collect Underpants!" src="http://www.mediashifters.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/apple-creation-0081-rm-eng1-300x199.jpg" alt="Step 3: Underpants!" width="300" height="199" /></p>
<p>And that’s why I think the iPad is kind of a dud. I doubt it will be a failure, but as far as I can tell the iPad doesn’t really solve a problem, or offer a killer App. Instead it relies on a maneuver I’ll call the “iPod Shuffle”: flowing out on a river of hype, it promises to build a bridge to nowhere, satisfying nothing more than a vague need to be a part of the world of Apple, and give us an echo of that oh-so-satisfying response we get when Apple has closed an actual loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediashifters.com/business/why-the-ipad-isnt-insanely-great/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Reilly explains what may kill the Kindle in the long run.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediashifters.com/uncategorized/oreilly-explains-whats-going-to-kill-kindle-in-the-long-run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediashifters.com/uncategorized/oreilly-explains-whats-going-to-kill-kindle-in-the-long-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediashifters.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s few people out there who have a better understanding of digital publishing than O&#8217;Reilly. He&#8217;s spent the better part of the last two decades publishing technical books that have given developers the information they need to make innovation happen, while being a driving force behind the rise of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;. In this article for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s few people out there who have a better understanding of digital publishing than O&#8217;Reilly. He&#8217;s spent the better part of the last two decades publishing technical books that have given developers the information they need to make innovation happen, while being a driving force behind the rise of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/22/kindle-oreilly-ebooks-technology-breakthroughs_oreilly.html">In this article for Forbes</a>he not only discusses why Amazon&#8217;s opaque DRM standards are eventually going to be the device&#8217;s biggest hurdle, but also the subtle, but important differences that have made the iPhone work even though it&#8217;s a locked down device.</p>
<blockquote><p>Amazon&#8217;s Kindle file format doesn&#8217;t provide support for tables or for so-called monospaced fonts, two formatting features that we use heavily in our line of technical books. And there is a viable alternative: Epub, the open format from the International Digital Publishing Forum, is based on the Web&#8217;s native format, HTML, and provides full table and font support. This is the first &#8220;strategy tax&#8221; paid by those who embrace proprietary platforms: They can&#8217;t support the needs of every niche and must prioritize their support for mainstream needs.</p>
<p>The single point of purchase was also a non-starter for us, since my fundamental understanding of information marketplaces is that they grow bigger and more lucrative for everyone when there is a rich ecosystem of cooperating players.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in understanding why open standards work for business and growth, it&#8217;s worth a read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediashifters.com/uncategorized/oreilly-explains-whats-going-to-kill-kindle-in-the-long-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

